View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000401 | LDMud 3.3 | Networking | public | 2005-09-09 06:58 | 2010-08-18 14:55 |
Reporter | lynx | Assigned To | Gnomi | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | always |
Status | resolved | Resolution | duplicate | ||
Product Version | 3.3 | ||||
Fixed in Version | 3.3.719 | ||||
Summary | 0000401: more control over discarded output | ||||
Description | this is how comm.c:add_message() handles the case of output lost in transmission as reported by a EINTR or EWOULDBLOCK. additionally we get some stderr warnings. if (ip->msg_discarded) { ip->msg_discarded = MY_FALSE; add_message("%s", "\n*** Text lost in transmission ***\n"); /* msg_discarded might be TRUE again now */ } i would prefer it the interactive or at least the master object was called instead, and given as much information as possible on the event. then it can decide to either recover the network link, or to drop it. but having a string output which is meaningless to most protocols other than telnet, is not exactly the solution these days... :-/ | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2005-09-09 06:58 | lynx | New Issue | |
2009-01-05 03:44 | Gnomi | Relationship added | child of 0000297 |
2009-05-19 16:04 | Gnomi | Note Added: 0001121 | |
2009-05-19 16:04 | Gnomi | Relationship replaced | duplicate of 0000297 |
2009-05-19 16:04 | Gnomi | Duplicate ID | 0 => 297 |
2009-05-19 16:04 | Gnomi | Status | new => resolved |
2009-05-19 16:04 | Gnomi | Fixed in Version | => 3.3.719 |
2009-05-19 16:04 | Gnomi | Resolution | open => duplicate |
2009-05-19 16:04 | Gnomi | Assigned To | => Gnomi |
2010-08-18 14:55 | zesstra | Note Added: 0001898 |