View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0000302LDMud 3.5Runtimepublic2018-01-30 03:59
ReporterlarsAssigned Tozesstra  
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityN/A
Status resolvedResolutionfixed 
Target Version3.5.0Fixed in Version3.5.0 
Summary0000302: Memory usage as runtime limit
Descriptionort: Memory usage as runtime limit
From: Menaures
Date: 2002-09-16
Type: Feature
State: New

 -- Since not all memory use is under control of the wizard (loading objects,
    swapping, activities by called objecs), this is tricky.
    It would be necessary to experiment first to see if we can actually
    track the memory usage, and maybe store it on a uid/object basis (like
    the eval costs).

Wäre es möglich, eine Speichergrenze einzuführen? Ich stelle mir das ähnlich
vor wie die Evalgrenze. Man darf während einer Ausführung nur eine bestimmte
Anzahl Bytes belegen.

Hintergrund:
Bisher ist es möglich, mit den simpelsten Einzeilern in kürzester Zeit den
gesamten MUD-Speicher vollzumüllen. Besonders ärgerlich wird das, wenn es aus
Versehen passiert, z.B. das Abbruchkriterium einer Schleife fehlt und man
addiert fröhlich strings solange, bis der Speicher voll ist (und hält dafür
nebenbei das MUD für 15 Minuten an, bis es sich danach verabschiedet).

Mit einer Speichergrenze von bleistiftsweise 4 Megabytes (oder ähnlich hohe
Zahl, die nie jemand braucht), würde bei erreichen dieses Limits ein RTE
geworfen werden, ähnlich einer Too Long Evaluation.

Damit könnten solche Fälle wenigstens nicht mehr 'aus Versehen' eintreten.
TagsNo tags attached.

Activities

zesstra

2009-09-26 15:52

administrator   ~0001294

Uh, seems to me quite complex and/or costly and probably also in parts undeterministic for wizards (e.g. might a string consume quite different amounts of memory depending it whether it is already a shared string). That will make it difficult to safe-guard critical code against abortions in the wrong moment. At least, without introducing transactions as well...

Gnomi

2009-09-29 03:31

manager   ~0001329

As Lars already pointed out, a memory limit per execution thread might be very unpredictable. Therefore such a limit must be very broad, but that might be feasible.

A limit per uid is expensive to track (each mapping, array, string must then store their list of uids they belong to, which must be updated on each assignment). So I'd rather not do that.

zesstra

2009-10-05 16:59

administrator   ~0001480

I agree. The part with the max consumption per execution thread might be done by monitoring the difference in allocated memory between execution start and now for allocators which support it. It is crude, but if the limit should be very broad...

zesstra

2011-02-14 16:24

administrator   ~0001984

The current suggestion then would be: simply monitor the difference between currently allocated memory and allocated memory at execution start and abort if that exceeds a certain value?

Or should be just abandon the idea?

Gnomi

2011-02-14 17:29

manager   ~0001989

I like the idea and it seems simple enough.

zesstra

2011-02-15 23:17

administrator   ~0001995

Fix committed in revision 2540c460af23372b707a59b779e59b11faa60bde to master branch (see changeset 764 for details). Thank you for reporting!

zesstra

2018-01-29 18:59

administrator   ~0002332

Fix committed in revision 2540c460af23372b707a59b779e59b11faa60bde to master branch (see changeset 1585 for details). Thank you for reporting!

zesstra

2018-01-29 21:57

administrator   ~0002383

Fix committed in revision 2540c460af23372b707a59b779e59b11faa60bde to master branch (see changeset 2916 for details). Thank you for reporting!

zesstra

2018-01-30 03:59

administrator   ~0002434

Fix committed in revision 2540c460af23372b707a59b779e59b11faa60bde to master branch (see changeset 3998 for details). Thank you for reporting!

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2004-11-27 00:04 lars New Issue
2009-09-26 15:52 zesstra Note Added: 0001294
2009-09-29 03:31 Gnomi Note Added: 0001329
2009-10-05 16:55 zesstra Project LDMud => LDMud 3.5
2009-10-05 16:59 zesstra Note Added: 0001480
2011-02-14 16:24 zesstra Note Added: 0001984
2011-02-14 16:24 zesstra Status new => feedback
2011-02-14 17:02 zesstra Target Version => 3.5.0
2011-02-14 17:29 Gnomi Note Added: 0001989
2011-02-14 23:55 zesstra Assigned To => zesstra
2011-02-14 23:55 zesstra Status feedback => assigned
2011-02-15 23:17 zesstra Source_changeset_attached => ldmud.git master 2540c460
2011-02-15 23:17 zesstra Note Added: 0001995
2011-02-15 23:17 zesstra Status assigned => resolved
2011-02-15 23:17 zesstra Resolution open => fixed
2017-10-04 18:56 zesstra Product Version 3.2.10 =>
2017-10-04 18:56 zesstra Fixed in Version => 3.5.0
2018-01-29 18:59 zesstra Source_changeset_attached => ldmud.git master 2540c460
2018-01-29 18:59 zesstra Note Added: 0002332
2018-01-29 21:57 zesstra Source_changeset_attached => ldmud.git master 2540c460
2018-01-29 21:57 zesstra Note Added: 0002383
2018-01-30 03:59 zesstra Source_changeset_attached => ldmud.git master 2540c460
2018-01-30 03:59 zesstra Note Added: 0002434